Digital Addiction and Mental health Among Youth
Digital Addiction and Mental health Among Youth
Written By:
Asfa Hanif
National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-E-Azam University,
Islamabad
laureatefolks@gmail.com
1
INTRODUCTION
For anyone's maximum
functioning and production, good mental health is vital. The globe has changed
dramatically in the previous few decades, particularly with the creation of
speedier forms of transportation, the ease with which people can migrate across
countries, and the revolutionary advances in communication technology (IT).
This has posed significant difficulties for mental health providers. Social connectedness,
physical activities, relationship bonds, as well as a more active lifestyle
that are linked with IT has been reduced due to Digital Revolution (UNPF
report, 2014). Social networking services are progressively replacing real-life
in-person engagement with an artificial sense of intimacy. Now a day’s significant
amount of time of our youth has been spent online and this youth has been
subjected to information detonations such as intense games, cybercrime, and cyberbullying.
The internet is also a source of misinformation, which is frequently unreliable
and has the potential to hurt children's minds. A recent example of such harm
is the Blue Whale game (Balhara, 2017).
Another
major issue that requires attention is the rise in youth violence, as youth are
at risk of becoming both victims and perpetrators of violence (Christensen,
2017). Cyberbullying is a type of bullying that has grown in popularity in
recent years as people get more access to and use internet-based services.
Cyberbullying and behavioral addictions are two major negative consequences of
the current digital age that disproportionately affect young people (Balhara,
2017). Web use problem is currently being perceived as another issue requiring
restorative intercessions (Winther, 2017). Another major group of young people
is those living on the streets or in shelters, which are particularly
vulnerable in the lack of family support and a stable environment. Drug use,
physical and sexual abuse, criminal behavior, and violence are all common
occurrences within this population (Patel, 2007). Mental illness, substance
abuse, and violence among young people are some of the major difficulties that
mental health practitioners and society face.
The advancement of
information technology has resulted in the manufacturing of low-cost
instruments and smart marketing of cell phones, desktops or PCs, laptops,
tablets, and LEDs. Furthermore, technological advancements on the Internet have
altered people's conceptions of time, place, and distance by facilitating
information transmission and making it easier to complete a variety of tasks
and activities using digital devices. Consequently, these high-tech instruments
are increasingly being employed at home and work (Temel, 2014).
1.1
Research
Questions
1.
What is the
perception of digital addiction among youth?
2.
What are the
symptoms and prevalence of digital addiction?
3.
How digital
addiction is different from other types of addiction?
4.
What is the role of
digital addiction on mental health of youth?
5.
How can we cope from
digital addiction?
1.2
Objectives
of the Study
1.
To define the digital
addiction
2.
To differentiate the
digital addiction from other sort of addiction.
3.
To fine out the
symptoms of digital addiction.
4.
To figure out the
impact of digital addiction on mental health.
5.
To discover the
different categories of digital addiction among youth.
6.
To fine out the
mitigation of digital addiction among youth.
1.3
Rationale
of the Study
Digital
Addiction can be diminished social connectedness and passionate adjustment,
just as expanded ADHD and distractibility or diminished self-drive (proactive
versus receptive conduct) there will probably be concessions to wellbeing and mental
condition (Swingle, 2016). For instance, in a meta-analysis
it is argued that tangible social seclusion along with apparent feelings of
loneliness boosted mortality by 30% (Holt et al., 2015). Additionally, it was summed
up that the neuroendocrine impacts social solitude and apparent loneliness on
specific brain systems, signifying that apparent loneliness coupled with cell phone
addiction. It also has negative influence on physical condition (Cacioppo et
al., 2015). Correspondingly, it is suggested that the term “phonelines”
indicates exclusively to the categories of apparent loneliness connected with cell
phone addiction attitudes (Pittman, 2017).
"Digital
addiction" may not show that an individual has a set up mental disorder
yet ought to be seen as an adapting technique for negative beneficial
encounters. All things considered, now and again, Internet dependence might be
a manifestation of a hidden psychological well-being issue, instead of a
condition itself.
The current study aided the identification of main risks digital addiction among youth. This research was mainly based literature review and previous. The findings of this study help to highlight the mental health issues and its different domains of mental illness among youth due to digital addiction. Current study intended to help in long run mitigation of digital addiction and aided to include this addiction in DSM.
2. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Due to its possible
addictive qualities and relationship with negative mental outcomes, an English therapist,
specialized in addiction named Mandy.S presaged parents that offering their
child a cell phone is as dangerous as offering them cocaine (Pells, 2017). Government
of French prohibited pupils makes use of cell phones in elementary, secondary,
and middle schools (Willsher, 2017). Owing to its colossal populace and broad
web access, China has been the world's biggest marketplace for web gaming
starting around 2015 (Market prospect Research Report 2019-2024). By the end of
April 2018, 4G network of China has contained 95 percent of its executive rural
areas and 99 percent of his people (Chinese Press conference, 2018). Usage of
online activities for example social media and gauging, as well as link between
misuse and negative psychological repercussions in kids, has gotten a lot of
attention. In recent years, news about possible internet addiction–related
negative events (such as a lower academic grade; self-damage, comprising
self-destruction and inadvertent death related to digital addiction; besides “digital
detox” training camps to treat web fixation in confined settings) has exploded,
what's more, some Chinese guardians and educators have alluded to web
dependence as "electronic opium" or "electronic heroin" (Phillips,
2018). As a result, the Chinese Ministry of Education issued an urgent notice
in April 2018 prohibiting elementary and medium school pupils after using the
internet.
The rapid advancement
of technology in the twenty-first century has facilitated easy and rapid access
to knowledge via the internet, which harms schoolchildren's physical and mental
health. Technology addictions include media, television, cellphones, computers,
and the internet. In terms of public health, the importance of technology
addiction is growing by the day. Children and teenagers' physical,
psychological, social, and cognitive development are all harmed as a result of
technology addiction (Cam, 2015). As a result of technological advancements, we
are now experiencing the digitization process (Kaplan, 2012).
Digital tools save
time by simplifying human existence, allowing for easy access to information,
and assisting in the enjoyment of time. Overuse of digital technologies, on the
other hand, generates lots of new issues. Addiction is an issue that causes
bodily and mental health problems in toddlers and teenagers (Arslan, 2015).
Addiction is characterized
as urges that are based on a propensity for engaging in a specific action or consuming
a particular drug, even though it has negative consequences for the
individual's bodily, psychological, emotive, and societal health, along with financial
status (Young, 2011). The addiction to liquor, cigarettes, drugs are grouped as
addictions to gambling, substance addictions, excessive sports participation,
excessive use of digital devices, and other behaviors are characterized as
"behavioral addictions." It is such sort of addiction that develops
because of the recurrent routine exclusive of being reliant on any material, in
which uncontrolled complications similar to those perceived in drug addiction
are present, in which the person continues to engage in the behavior despite
knowing that he or she is affected (Kr, 2014). Behavioral addiction is
influenced by a variety of elements. Few people are hereditarily predisposed to
behavior addiction, according to this. Behavioral addiction is influenced by
psychological and social factors such as depression and social anxiety, as well
as psychological and social issues such as poor family support and social
relations (Chang, 2012).
Addiction currently encompasses
drug or stuff abuse only; it is including gambling also, the web, video gaming,
and even cell phones. These are also classified as behavioral addictions (Lee,
2006). Fast-developing media, such as the internet and cellphones in advanced
IT businesses, have produced this new sort of addiction. It has piqued the
interest of nations all around the world. Smartphone hardware and software are
rapidly developing, and a wide range of applications are being developed and
made available to fit our lifestyle. This transformation is beyond our wildest
dreams. A smartphone can be used as a computer, mp3 player, or video player in
addition to being a phone. You may simply obtain whatever information you
require at any time or location. There are numerous other benefits, including,
but not limited to, entertainment. As a result, many people in today's culture
are eager to get their hands on a smartphone. Smartphones increasingly play a
crucial part in everyday activities due to quick access to e-platforms and
programs such as Facebook and WhatsApp (Junco and Cotton 2012).
Many criteria have
been proposed in the literature to determine whether or not a person is a
behavioral addict. Griffiths (2016) stated on this issue that behavior or
action must reveal the qualities listed beneath classification of behavioral
addiction.
1.
Salience: When an activity turns
out to be significant in a person's life, it attracts attention.
2.
Mood modification: The act that influences
the person's feeling.
3.
Tolerance: Growth in numbers an
act is repeated to demonstrate the influence it has on an individual.
4.
Withdrawal: When an action is
terminated, it causes unpleasant feelings or physical symptoms.
5.
Conflict: An interference that
occurs among the person and those across him/her as a result of the action.
6.
Relapse: When a behavior is
avoided or controlled for a lengthy period, it is more likely to occur again.
New types of behavioral addiction are emerging as a result of advancements in digital software. These new forms include digital game addiction and Facebook addiction (Yalçn, 2015). Additionally, innovative devices that are well-suited with digital equipment are being created, and different sorts of new addictions are being documented. An example of this is smartphone addiction (Noyan, 2016). Because of the rapid advancement of technology, new types of addiction can be added to this category. It is necessary to characterize addictive behavior to clarify what digital addiction is. When we do something too much, according to Cash (2012), the brain is obliged to abandon Neuro-receptors to reinstate equilibrium, particularly when no more obtain the same extreme after the identical amount of action or drug usage. The term "digital addict" refers to an individual whose collaboration with internet or web is bordering on disproportionate, pressuring to consume their interest above all, as a result, harming the user's wellbeing. When employed as a colloquial term, the term "digital junkie" refers to an ever-increasing reliance on electronics in the digital age.
2.1
Conceptual
Model
of the Study
Figure 1 Conceptual
Model of the Study based on Addiction and Mental Health
3
DEFINING
DIGITAL ADDICTION
The term "digital
addiction" is familiar to describe the cautionary signals of being overly
visible to technology appliances sometimes when the usage of digital appliances
in routine events is snowballing at an alarming rate, and the risk of getting
reliant on them is growing (Joseph, 2016). "Digital addiction (DA)
signifies a dysfunctional relationship with the technology portrayed as
uncontrollable, fanatical, spontaneous, and injudicious” (Alrobai, 2018).
Digital addiction is a new field of study that looks into people's problematic
use of digital technology. This includes debating whether or not this behavior
can be classified as a mental illness, and if it does what symptomatic
standards have to be used (Poli, 2017). In different parts of the world, the
prevalence of digital addiction varies, with forecasts stretching from 2.6-10.9
percent in Europe and Middle East (Cheng & Li, 2014).
"A central,
prolonged disorder of brain incentive, retention, inspiration, and relevant
circuits," according to ASAM and according to the American Psychiatric
Association (APA). Biological, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects
result from circuit dysfunction. This is evident in a person's pathological
desire for incentive and support through drug abuse and additional behaviors (Peper,
2018)." Digital Addiction (DA) is accustomed to describing exceptionally
debatable use of digital broadcasting, which is typically accompanied by
negative outcomes such as distraction, sleep deprivation, and a loss of social
skills. DA has been claimed to contain numerous subtypes such as web addiction,
cyber-relationships addiction, gaming addiction, and misinformation, even
though there is still no definitive description for this disorder (Young et
al., 2011). Despite the consequences of clinical condition, the phenomena are
turning into a recognized worldwide concern, necessitating a rising demand for
valuable and accessible health therapies that allow consumers to regain control
(Montag & Reuter, 2015).
DA refers to a concept
that encompasses games, social networking, smartphone, and Internet addictions,
among other things (Jiang, 2015). According to this definition, DA is an urge
to continue utilizing digital instruments even though it is well recognized
that excessive use of such instruments can cause bodily, mental, emotive, and
community problems for a human being (Kesici & Tunç, 2018). Several types
of research on DA have lately been published in other countries. In Turkey, DA
is also a severe issue for the kids. The clearest indication to treat digital
addicts is to open polyclinics (Cover, 2004).
3.1
Categories
of Digital Addiction
Media addiction
including TV plays movies or video, music, gaming etc. These are all
illustrations of digital addictions that arise in a variety of ways that cover
varying degrees and sectors of technological usage (Joseph et al., 2016).
Young, identified Pc (games) addiction, Net compulsions, Information overload, Sexual
addiction(online), and Cyber-relationship addiction are the five types of
online addiction (Young, 1999). Social net addiction is a somewhat recent
phenomenon, will be fall into the final group, although this could also include
aspects from the other categories, such as games.
Gandolfi
(2010) lists the following Categories:
1.
Information overload: Excessive online browsing reduces workplace productivity
and reduces family interactions.
2.
Compulsive Addiction: Spending too much time on the phone or online in hobbies
like gaming, stock trading, wagering, and even auction bridge can take the lead
to extravagance and job troubles.
3.
Cybersex Addiction: Too much pornographic site surfing can harm actual
relationships.
4.
Cyber-relationship Addiction: Unnecessary use of social networking sites to
form connections instead of giving time to family and peers can lead to the
breakdown of real-life relationships.
5.
Internet Addiction is a type of virtual addiction.
6.
Solicitation over the internet.
Facebook Addiction
Disorder (FAD), Widget Addiction Disorder (WAD), YouTube Addiction Disorder
(YAD), Twitter Addiction Disorder (TAD), Google Search Addiction Disorder
(GSAD), are among the new types of digital addiction identified by Gandolfi
(2010).
3.2
Prevalence of Digital
Addiction
Large variation
has been documented in prevalence research on Internet addiction among
adolescents. According to a recent survey conducted across 11 European nations,
the incidence of obsessive Internet clients went from 1.2 percent in Italy to
11.8 percent in Israel (Durkee et al., 2012). 13.8 percent adolescent Internet
addiction was reported in Taiwan (Yang, 2007), in South Korea 10.7 percent
(Park et al, 2007), in Hong Kong 3.0 percent to 6.7 percent (Lai et al 2013; fu
et al., 2010), and in China 2.4 percent to 6.0 percent (Tang et al., 2014).
In India, the
number of smartphone users in 2018 was reached 339.95 million and is expected
to reach in 2022 till 442.5 million. (Statista, 2018). According to a survey by
the American Common-Sense Media, three-fourth of adolescents having their own
cell phones, and one-fourth express that they are always online.
3.3
Symptoms
of Digital Addiction
The physical and emotional signs of a digital space addiction are both apparent (Petry et al., 2014). Anxiety, depression, and isolation are common emotional symptoms of digital addicts (Zhang et al., 2019), and weight gain or loss, back pain, headaches, nap difficulties, and distorted eyesight are common physical symptoms of digital addicts (Zhang et al., 2019). (Kandasamy et al., 2019). The most common symptom of digital addicts is Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (Colucci et al., 2018).
There is
presently no professional diagnostic for technology addiction in USA, and the
DSM V does not address it (DSM-V). Internet Gambling Disorder, a subcategory of
Gambling Disorder, is the closest diagnosis described by the American
Psychiatric Association. The American Psychological Association has publicly
acknowledged Internet addiction, and other states for instance Republic of
China and South Korea, as well as the WHO, have identified web addiction as a
substantial hazard to community health (Sternlicht, 2021).
Even with the
lack of unanimity on diagnostic criteria for digital addictions, several researches
have been published that provides useful information on the indications and
signs of digital addictions. Even though the amount of time that youth spent on
digital devices can be a clear indicator of digital addiction, the rate of
recurrence and period paid on digital gadgets do not always indicate a
technological addiction. Technology addiction is visible at the point when
advanced utilization meddles with one's everyday existence and in general
prosperity, and when the person has a concern with utilizing their preferred digital
media.
The following are
some indicators of a technology addiction by Lin and Aaron (2021):
1. Incapability or
refrain from using hi-tech or a particular digital channel.
2. An obsession in
considering how to use technology things.
3. Compulsive use
of technology or cravings and desires to utilize digital devices.
4. Prioritizing
technology above crucial life areas such as employment, school, or
relationships.
5. Use digital
gadgets even though it has negative implications in your life.
6. You've lost
attention in public and relaxation events that are used to like because of
technology.
7. Using digital
gadgets in potentially risky conditions, for instance car drive or road or
street crossing in the city.
8. Having unwelcome
psychological illness symptoms like sadness, tension, anxiety, or irritation as
a result of technological use.
9. Inducing pleasure
or gratification through the use of digital gadgets.
10. As a result of
guilt or humiliation, dishonesty or disguising advanced utilization from their
friends, peers and family.
11. Using digital
gadgets for longer periods than intended or increasing the frequency with which
you use them over time.
Digital
addictions are viewed by some mental health specialists as a sign of an
additional condition, for instance depression and anxiety, rather than distinct
ailment. It's been labeled like an instinct control disorder also from a few (not
otherwise specified). Nonetheless, numerous experts in fields of addiction and psychological
wellbeing see digital addictions (DA) as a distinct psychological disease, and
upcoming version of the DSM may include it. Addictions are not restricted to
drugs and alcohol, according to the American Society of Addiction Medicine.
They can also be behavioral in origin. All addictions are defined by a flip out,
mood swings, impatience, revocation, and continued consumption regardless of
its negative effects, these all can be met by a digital addiction.
4
DIGITAL
ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH AMONG YOUTH
It is assumed that
Digital addiction follows the bio-psycho-social model. Persons who develop
digital addiction may have biological susceptibility for addictive disorders
(e.g., substance use disorders, obsessive gambling) and other psychiatric
ailments such as ADHD and depression. The risk for digital addiction may also
increase when people go through rewarding experiences through digital endeavors
such as online gaming.
Sunwoo and Rando (2002) listed many elements that contribute to digital addiction, including personal ones like low self-efficacy. People who are too introverted and can't simply connect to their friends are at a greater threat of acquiring a digital addiction (DA), according to most research (Griffiths, 2011). People with anxiety and depression, for example, are vulnerable to developing a digital addiction. They go off digital media to meet their needs for the reason that they lack emotive assistance, (Castille, 2012). According to research from the University of Lowa, digital addiction is particularly widespread in depressed men aged 20-30 (Durak, 2018). Just as being anxious or sad can have a significant impact on the advancement of a digital addiction (Rosen, Larry D.; 2012).
Digital addictions can
be lethal in extreme circumstances. Although death as a result of digital
addiction is uncommon, it does occur. The majority of fatal occurrences occur
when people use their phones while performing high-risk activities like driving
a car or capturing pictures/videos for social sites material on the rocks,
overpasses, and more dangerous locations where one incorrect move can end in
death. There have also been exceedingly rare cases of people using technology
for extended periods deprived of consumption and napping for whole days,
resulting in mortality (Lin & Aaron, 2021).
Digital addictions
(DA) can have other harmful and dangerous consequences for individuals and
families. Digital addictions, for example, might harm an individual's career or
education by diverting their attention away from school or work-related
activities. Procrastination and avoidance of work can be the result of digital
addiction. Relationships can be harmed by digital addictions because the person
loses interest in interacting or communicating in favor of their electronic
gadget. Isolation thrives in the technological world (Lin &Aaron, 2021).
Technology addictions
can harm one's psychological wellbeing, aggravating or leading to apprehension,
depression, ADHD, and other problems. Restlessness, impatience, anxiety, and
wrath are all symptoms of technology addiction. In addition, digital addiction
can impair the mind's capacity to manufacture organic happy neurotransmitters
like dopamine, along with cause impulsivity (Lin & Aaron, 2021).
Back pain, headaches,
carpal tunnel syndrome and fluctuating weight are just a few of the physical
health issues that can result from technology addiction. Digital addictions can
result in insomnia or poor sleep hygiene, which can exacerbate underlying
mental health disorders and lead to elevated stress levels. Physical health can
be harmed by excessive internet usage due to inadequate sustenance, inadequate
bodily activity and poor self-aid (Lin & Aaron, 2021).
In terms of mental
health, new research has linked increased smartphone use to sleep difficulties
and depression (Lemola, 2015). Furthermore, the intensity of cell phone addiction
is highly linked to the occurrence and time paid on cellphones (Lin et al.,
2015). Cell phones have been connected to relaxation and life pleasure (Lepp et
al., 2015). Smartphone addiction is predicted by many reasons for instance, family
stress, societal self-efficacy, and emotional strain (Chiu, 2014).
Cell phone addiction,
regarded as a type of technology addiction (Lin et al., 2014). Griffiths operationalized
organic addictions related to behaviors involved human-machinery interface. Non-substance-related
condition suggested for inclusion in DSM-5 as a substance-related and addictive
disorder is web gaming disorder, apart from 'gambling disorder (APA, 2013). Cell
phone addiction shares some characteristics with DSM-5 substance-related
disorders, including obsessive behavior, functional impairment, withdrawal, and
tolerance (Lin et al., 2014).
In their online social
networking study, Kuss and Griffiths (2011) addressed the possibility of SNS
addiction, and Park and Lee (2012) revealed that cell phone application might
be linked to isolation, sadness, and self-respect in their cell phone application
and mental well-being study. China investigated the psychological risk factors
of social networking site addiction in Chinese smartphone users by looking at
outcome expectancies, impulsivity, and digital self-efficacy (Wu et al., 2013).
Other research undertaken by university students in South Korea has found a
link between smartphone addiction and mental wellbeing, college or university life,
interpersonal relationships, will power, and stress related to life (Choi and
Lee, 2012). Youth may possibly at a larger probability of developing these
complications with smartphone application than adults, according to Korea,
because they utilize smartphones as an alternative means to access the
internet, as evidenced by their new tendencies in the media addiction study
(Kim et al., 2012).
Smartphone addiction and other trends of smartphone overuse among Asian
adolescents and young people are linked to a variety of issues. These include,
for example, depression and anxiety (Kim et al., 2019), loneliness and
shyness (Bian et
al., 2014), low psychological well-being (Tangmunkongvorakul, et al., 2019),
low self-esteem (Wang et
al., 2017), substance use (alcohol use and smoking) (Kim et al., 2019), poor sleep
quality (Tao et al.,
2017), low academic performance (Chung et al., 2017), being female (Kim et al., 2019S), having a poor
relationship with parents (Lee et al., 2017), less involvement at school and
less satisfaction with school life (Lee et al., 2017,) and negative parenting
style.
More than 20% of
Japanese adolescents used the internet, and there was a clear link between
Internet addiction and mental health issues like suicidal depression. Because
cellphones are most closely related to Internet addiction, adolescents who use
them in a controlled manner may be able to avoid or at least reduce their risk
of being addicted to the internet (Kentaro et al., 2016).
According to an
increasing number of studies, Internet addiction is a psychosocial condition
with the following characteristics: tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, affective
disorders, and social relationship issues. The internet usage can cause mental,
public, academic, and employment problems in an individual’s life (Beard,
2001). Pathological Internet users accounted for 18% of the study participants,
unnecessary usage of internet was generating educational, public, and personal issues
(Griffiths, 2005). Exorbitant Internet use can prompt a serious level of mental
excitement, which can prompt absence of rest, significant stretches of fasting,
and restricted actual exercise, just as physical and psychological well-being
issues like despondency, OCD, helpless family associations, and tension (Young,
1998).
Subjective suffering,
operational loss, and other psychological disorders have all been connected with
problematic Internet use (Shapira 2000). Furthermore, numerous researchers have
found links between Internet addiction and mental symptoms in adolescents, such
as depression, anxiety, loneliness, self-efficacy, and so on (Jang, 2008).
The most common
psychiatric symptom connected with excessive Internet use is depression (Jang,
2008). High levels of Internet addiction, on the other hand, were not found to
be significantly linked to depression (Kim, 2006).
Although numerous
studies have looked into the link between Internet addiction and psychiatric
symptoms like sadness, few studies have looked into the link between
psychiatric disorders like somatization and psychosis and Internet addiction.
The previous study had conflicting results, and their findings were limited
(Alavi, 2010).
Internet addiction is
common among undergraduate college students, and it has been linked to sadness,
anxiety, and stress. When college students visit their primary care physician
for typical mental health issues including depression, anxiety, or stress, IA
should be evaluated (Gupta, 2018). Adolescents with Internet addiction are more
likely indulge other psychological issues, such as liquor and stuff abuse, self-destructive
ideation, depression, ADHD, fears, schizophrenia, OCD, and violence. Youth who
use the Internet is more prone to suffer from depression, anxiety, alcoholism,
uncontrollable behaviors, nap difficulties, aggression problems, and potentially
dissociative encounters (Griffiths. 2018).
Internet addiction has
been linked to poor sleep quality (Lam, 2014), ADHD symptoms, anxiety,
depression (Zhang, 2014), and even suicidality in some cross-sectional research
(Cheng, 2018). Lau et al (2018] discovered that internet addiction and
depression have a bidirectional predictive association in long-term research.
In the context of more longitudinal research, higher levels of distraction and
self-esteem issues were indicators of addiction, and this addiction was further
analyst of teenage emotional stress (Wartberg, 2019). According to some
research, the connection between digital addiction and hyperactivit is higher
than the link between digital addiction and other common psychopathologies like
depression (Andreassen, 2019).
5
COPING
TO DIGITAL ADDICTION
Initiative in
addressing digital addiction for a person to recognize that they have a problem
and wish to seek treatment. This is frequently the most difficult phase for the
individual. Frequently, family and friends become aware of the problem and seek
assistance on the individual's behalf. In many circumstances, an intervention
is required to aid the individual in recognizing the problem and beginning
therapy. In the event that an individual has a will power, the issue can be
settled through self-remedial practices, moderating the screen-life, and
mechanical advancements that aid in computerized balance, for example,
empowering application limitations or Wi-Fi limitations, winding down warnings,
empowering "Don't Disturb" mode, setting up programmed email/text
reactions, empowering programmed personal time, obstructing applications, or
empowering programmed vacation.
There are various
types of therapy for technological addictions accessible for those who may want
professional help from an addiction therapist. Because each person is
different, with their mix of conditions, signs and record, it's critical to get
a therapy plan those functions for them and personalize this for their own
desires. The contributing variables contributing to digital addiction, for
instance neural abnormalities, core mental wellbeing concerns, and external stimuli,
must be addressed.
Persuasive
talking, CBT/REBT, Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT), Acceptance and
Commitment Therapy (ACT), Reality Therapy (RT), experiential experience-based
treatment, mindfulness strategies, and social adjustment are some of the most
common treatment modalities for digital addiction. Moreover, family or group
therapy, individual therapy, or some integrated therapy can all be used in a
multimodal treatment strategy. To address underlying mental health concerns,
pharmacological interventions may be used. Contemplation, sustenance, bodily work
out, environment, and additional organic cures are frequently emphasized in holistic
and wellness-based treatments. Although inpatient residential treatment for
digital addictions is available, most therapy is done on an outpatient basis.
In today's
digital environment, total abstinence from technology is both impractical and
ineffective as a means of resolving the problem. There is agreement that the
goal of treatment should not be abstinence from digital gadgets, but rather control
and equilibrium. In any case, forbearance from computerized gadgets, or if
nothing else restraint from the wellspring of the issue (for instance,
web-based media, gaming, pornography, and other advanced sources that are not
at the base of the singular's enslavement), might be energized for the initial
45 to 90 days of treatment until the person can run after balance in case
balance is the objective.
According to the
surveys, minimum 64% of population nowadays spends up to 4 hours of their daily
free time on screen (Twenge, 2019). This extra inactive time is detrimental to
our health, just like watching TV has been associated to greater incidences of
diabetes and overweightness (Henson, Joseph., et al.; 2018). The following are
some strategies for dealing with digital addiction:
1. Before going to
bed, unplug all digital media, gadgets, or platforms (Georgina, 2019),
2. Switch off your
cell phone's notifications (Elizabeth, 2018),
3. Digital detoxifies
to tackle your digital addiction (Harshika, 2018),
4. One of the best
ways to deal with technology-related stress and addiction is to practice stress
management (Yuvaraj, 2015).
6
CONCLUSION
The
digital era has modernized human existence, is setting down deep roots and has
numerous positive angles that can upgrade youth learning and strengthening. The
more youthful ages are growing up with and making Internet a vital piece of
their lives; however, in a couple of occurrences, Internet use becomes
dangerous like addiction. Digital Addiction (DA) is an advancing issue in area
of psychology, a drive control problem that includes the fanatical utilization
of advanced gadgets, and additionally advanced mode, regardless of adverse
results to the utilization of computerized innovations. The problem could be stated
as technological habit, digital compulsion, and so forth. A couple of years
back, we saw a fast ascent of figuring and versatile innovation, affecting
humanoid behavior modification, along with usual tags such as digital
addiction, computerized nervousness, or adverse consequences of the utilization
of technology, zeroed in on the reason for clinical psychology with mental and
social effect, impeding for technological clients. It incorporates a broad
extent of information space of mental wellness and health advancement among
youth. Lastly, Digital compulsion isn't perceived by DSM V and ICD-11, this
review is an achievement in the creation and set up theoretical outline in
advanced habit.
6.1
Future
Recommendations and Implications
The current review has
shown that the utilization of comparative parts of DA definitions was
predictable across Internet, gaming, and cell phone dependence. This gives
proof that there are comparative models being utilized to concentrate on DA as
a substance. Future exploration could examine whether the models that are
presently used to portray DA is observationally settled inside the Internet,
cell phone and gaming dependence. The investigation discovered that the meaning
of side effects of DA has been related with substance use. In any case, ebb and
flow human associations with the Internet, gaming and cell phones have shown
that these are incorporated and utilized for regular day to day existence thus
future examination could build up what exercises people are dependent on
through the medium that works with the action. It should be noticed that there
are special attributes to DA that give various freedoms to definition and
understanding that are absent in other habit-forming practices. Practices
dependent on the utilization of a computerized gadget can be followed and
imparted to specialists in a goal and measured way that is seldom conceivable
in, for instance, liquor use. Using this kind of information might assist
specialists with arriving at a superior comprehension of what DA is and how it
ought to be conceptualized, and thusly, how it ought to be characterized and
possibly analyzed. Regardless of whether the wonder isn't as of this current
year perceived as a diagnosable psychological well-being problem, such
examination could likewise assist with illuminating the plan regarding
web-based media stages, to alleviate hurtful encounters related with DA.
7
REFERENCES
Alavi
SS, Maracy MR, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Haghighi M. A survey Relationship
between Psychiatric symptoms and Internet addiction disorder in students of
Isfahan universities. Scientific
Journal of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2010;17(2):57–]
Alexander, B. K. 2008. The Globalisation of Addiction: A Study in
Poverty of the Spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ali, R., Jiang, N., Phalp, K., Muir, S.,
& McAlaney, J. (2015). The emerging requirement
for digital addiction labels. The 20th International Working Conference on
Requirements Engineering: Foundation
for Software Quality (REFSQ 2015), Essen, Germany. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16101-3_13
Alrobai, A., McAlaney, J., Phalp, K., &
Ali, R. (2016a). Exploring the risk factors of interactive e-health
interventions for digital addiction. International Journal of Sociotechnology
and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), 8(2), 1–15. doi: 10.4018/IJSKD.2016040101.
Alrobai, Amen. Engineering social networking
to combat digital addiction: the case of online peer groups. Diss. Bournemouth
University, 2018.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Arslan A, Kırık, AM, Karaman M, Çetinkaya A.
Digital addiction in high school and university students. International
Peer-Reviewed Journal of Communication And Humanities Research 2015; 8(8):
34-58.
Balhara YP, Bhargava R,
Chadda R. Service development for behavioural addictions: AIIMS
experience. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci
(India) 2017;53:130–8.
Beard
KW, Wolf EM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet
addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001;4(3):377–83.
Cam HH, Nur N. A Study on the prevalence of
Internet addiction and its association with psychopathological symptoms and
obesity in adolescents. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2015;14:181-8.
Cao F, Su L. Internet addiction among Chinese
adolescents: prevalence and psychological features. Child Care Health Dev.
2007;33(3):275-281.
Cash,
H., Rae, C. D., Steel, A. H., & Winkler, A. (2012). Internet Addiction: A
Brief Summary of Research and Practice. Current psychiatry reviews, 8(4), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340012803520513
Castille, Christopher M., and Tilman L.
Sheets. "The Five Factor Model of personality and employees’ excessive use
of technology." Computers in Human Behavior 28.5 (2012): 1947-1953.
Chang JPC, Hung CC. Problematic internet use.
IACAPAP e-Textbook of Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Geneva: International
Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions 201; 2.
Chen B,
Liu F, Ding S, Ying X, Wang L, Wen Y. Gender differences in factors associated
with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college
students. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):341–. pmid:29017482.
Cheng Y, Tseng P, Lin P,
Chen T, Stubbs B, Carvalho AF, et al. Internet Addiction and Its Relationship
With Suicidal Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of Multinational Observational
Studies. J Clin Psychiatry 2018 Jun 05;79(4):17r11761.
Chinabgao.
URL: http://www.chinabgao.com/report/print4726461.html [accessed
2019-04-06]
Chiu, 2014 S.-I. Chiu the relationship between life stress and
smartphone addiction on taiwanese university student: a mediation model of
learning self-Efficacy and social self-Efficacy Computers in Human
Behavior, 34 (0) (2014), pp. 49-57.
Choi HS,
Lee HK, Ha J (2012) The influence of smartphone addiction on mental health,
campus life and personal relations – Focusing on K university students. Journal
of Korean Data & Information Science Society 23(5): 1005–1015.
Christensen H,
Reynolds CF 3rd, Cuijpers P. Protecting youth mental health, protecting our
future. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:327–8.
Chung
JE, Choi SA, Kim KT, Yee J, Kim JH, Seong JW, et al. Smartphone addiction risk
and daytime sleepiness in Korean adolescents. Journal of paediatrics and child
health. 2018;54(7):800Epub 2018/04/08. pmid:29626363.
Colucci, Annalisa. "The Role of the
Social Networks, between a Utility and a New Addiction." Psychiatria
Danubina 30.Suppl 7 (2018): 511-514.
Cover R. Digital addiction: The cultural production
of online and video games junkies media. International Australia Incorporating
Culture and Policy 2004; 113,110-123
Dalbudak et al., 2013E. Dalbudak, C. Evren, S. Aldemir, K.S. Coskun, H. Ugurlu, F.G. Yildirim
Relationship of internet addiction
severity with depression, anxiety, and alexithymia, temperament and character
in university students.Dubois M. Log in, Sign out. The World of Chinese.
URL: http://www.theworldofchinese.com/2013/03/log-in-sign-out/ [accessed
2017-08-06]
Durkee T, Kaess M, Carli V et al. Prevalence
of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: demographic and
social factors. Addiction. 2012;107(12):2210-2222.
Fu KW, Chan WS, Wong PW, Yip PS. Internet
addiction: prevalence, discriminant validity and correlates among adolescents
in Hong Kong. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(6):486-492.
Fuller, Georgina. "TIME FOR A SCREEN
BREAK?." Community Practitioner 92.4 (2019): 34-39.
Gandolfi. "Effect of balance training on
postural instability in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease."
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24.9 (2010): 826-834.
Griffiths, M. (1996). Gambling on the
internet: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(4), 471–473.
Griffiths, M. Internet Addiction: Fact or
Fiction? The Psychologist, 12(5), 246-250. (Trans.: K. Alat), Turkish
Psychological Bulletin 1999. ISSN: 1300-7408. Available
from:http://www.isgucdergi.org/?p=article&id=39&cilt=5&sayi=1&yil=2003.
Available on September 15, 2016.
Gupta,
A., Khan, A. M., Rajoura, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (2018). Internet
addiction and its mental health correlates among undergraduate college students
of a university in North India. Journal
of family medicine and primary care, 7(4), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_266_17
Henson, Joseph, et al. "Sedentary Time
and MRI‐Derived
Measures of Adiposity in Active Versus Inactive Individuals." Obesity 26.1
(2018): 29-36.
Henson, Joseph, et al. "Sedentary Time
and MRI‐Derived
Measures of Adiposity in Active Versus Inactive Individuals." Obesity 26.1
(2018): 29-36.
Jang KS,
Hwang SY, Choi JY. Internet addiction and psychiatric symptoms among Korean
adolescents. J Sch Health. 2008;78(3):165–71.
Junco, R., and S.
R. Cotton. 2012. “No A 4 U: The Relationship Between Multitasking and
Academic Performance.” Computers
& Education 59: 505–514.
doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
Kandasamy, Sunitha, Abdulrahuman Mohamed
Buhari, and Shyamala Janaki. "A study on anxiety disorder among college
students with internet addiction." International Journal Of Community
Medicine And Public Health 6.4 (2019): 1695-1700.
Kaplan K, Ertürk E. Digital age and
ideological devices of the individual. The Turkish Online Journal of Design,
Art and Communication – TOJDA 2012; 2(4).
Kardefelt-Winther
D. Conceptualizing internet use disorders: Addiction or coping process? Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;71:459–66.
Kesici, A., & Tunç, N. F. (2018).
Investigating the digital addiction level of the university students according
to their purposes for using digital tools. Universal
Journal of Educational Research, 6(2),
245–241. doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060204
Kim DI,
Lee YH, Lee JY, Kim MC, Keum CM, et al. (2012) New Patterns in Media Addiction:
Is Smartphone a Substitute or a Complement to the Internet? The Korean Journal
of Youth Counseling 20(1): 71–88.
Kim K,
Ryu E, Chon MY, Yeun EJ, Choi SY, Seo JS, et al. Internet addiction in Korean
adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a
questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs
Stud. 2006;43(2):185–92.
Kim NS,
Lee KE (2012) Effects of self-control and life stress on smart phone addiction
of university students. Journal of the Korea Society of Health Informatics and
Statistics 37(2): 72–83.
Kim S-G,
Park J, Kim H-T, Pan Z, Lee Y, McIntyre RS. The relationship between smartphone
addiction and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and
attention-deficit/hyperactivity in South Korean adolescents. Annals of general
psychiatry. 2019;18:1–. pmid:30899316.
Kır İ, Sulak Ş. Determining internet
addiction level of faculty of education students. Electronic Journal of Social
Sciences 2014; 13(51).
Király O, Griffiths MD,
Urbán R, Farkas J, Kökönyei G, Elekes Z, et al. Problematic internet use and
problematic online gaming are not the same: findings from a large nationally
representative adolescent sample. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014
Dec;17(12):749-754
Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J,
Helgeson V, Crawford A. Internet paradox revisited. J Soc Issues.
2002;58(1):49-74.
Kuss DJ,
Griffiths MD (2011) Online social networking and addiction—a review of the
psychological literature. International journal of environmental research and
public health 8(9): 3528–3552.
Kuss DJ,
Griffiths MD, Karila L and Billieux J. Internet Addiction: A Systematic Review
of Epidemiological Research for the Last Decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design.
20.
Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D.: Online social
networking and addiction - a review of the psy-chological literature.
Environmental research and public health 8.9 (2011): 3528-3552.
Kwon M,
Kim D-J, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and
validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one. 2013;8(12):e83558–e.
pmid:24391787.
Kwon M,
Lee JY, Won WY, Park JW, Min JA, et al. (2013) Development and Validation of a
Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). PloS one 8(2): e56936.
Lam LT. Internet gaming
addiction, problematic use of the internet, and sleep problems: a systematic
review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2014 Apr;16(4):444
Lau JTF, Walden DL, Wu AMS,
Cheng K, Lau MCM, Mo PKH. Bidirectional predictions between Internet addiction
and probable depression among Chinese adolescents. J Behav Addict 2018 Sep
01;7(3):633-643
Lee C,
Lee S-J. Prevalence and predictors of smartphone addiction proneness among
Korean adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review. 2017;77(C):10–7.
Lee HJ,
Kim JW, Choi TY. Risk Factors for Smartphone Addiction in Korean Adolescents:
Smartphone Use Patterns. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2017;32:1674–9.
pmid:28875613
Lee, S., Kang, H. &
Shin, G. (2015). Head flexion angle while using a smartphone. Ergonomics,
58(2), 220–226
Lemola, S., Perkinson-Gloor, N., Brand, S.,
Dewald-Kaufmann, J. F. & Grob, A. (2015). Adolescents’ electronic media use
at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(2), 405–418.
Lepp et al., 2014
A. Lepp, J.E. Barkley, A.C. Karpinski The relationship between cell phone use,
academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college student Computers in Human
Behavior, 31 (2014), pp. 343-350.
Lin, Y. H., Chang, L. R., Lee, Y. H., Tseng,
H. W., Kuo, T. B. & Chen, S. H. (2014). Development and validation of the
Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI). PloS One, 9(6), e98312.
Montag, C., & Reuter, M. (2015). Internet Addiction: Neuroscientific
Approaches and Therapeutical Interventions. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07242-5
Noyan CO, Enez Darçın A, Nurmedov S, Yılmaz
O, Dilbaz N. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Smartphone
Addiction Scale-Short Version among university students. Anatolian Journal of
Psychiatry 2015; 16(Special issue.1):73-81.
Park N,
Lee H (2012) Social Implications of Smartphone Use: Korean College Students'
Smartphone Use and Psychological Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and
Social Networking 15(9): 491–497.
Park SK, Kim JY, Cho CB. Prevalence of
Internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean
adolescents. Adolescence. 2007;43(172):895-909.
Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P. Mental health of young
people: A global public-health challenge. Lancet. 2007;369:1302–13.
Pells R. 'Giving your kid a
smartphone like giving them a gram of cocaine': Expert. The Chronicle.
URL: https://www.thechronicle.com.au/news/giving-you-kid-smartphone-giving-them-gram-cocaine/3211542/ [accessed
2017-06-06]
Peper, Erik, and Richard Harvey.
"Digital addiction: Increased loneliness, anxiety, and depression."
NeuroRegulation 5.1 (2018): 3-3.
Petry, Nancy M., et al. "An
international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new
DSM‐5
approach." Addiction 109.9 (2014): 1399-1406.
Pew Reserch Center. Teens, Social Media &
Technology 2018.
2018.www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-socialmedia-technology-2018
Phillips T. 'Electronic
heroin': China's boot camps get tough on internet addicts. The Guardian. 2017
Aug 28. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/electronic-heroin-china-boot-camps-internet-addicts [accessed
2018-02-08]
Poli, R. (2017). Internet addiction update:
diagnostic criteria, assessment and prevalence. Neuropsychiatry, 7(1), 4–8. doi:10.4172/Neuropsychiatry.1000171
Press conference on
developments in the industrial communications industry, three quarters of 2018.
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of
China. URL: http://www.miit.gov.cn/Searchweb/news.jsp [accessed
2019-10-23]
RC, Zhang MW, Tsang TY, Toh AH, Pan F, Lu Y, et al. The association
between internet addiction and psychiatric co-morbidity: a meta-analysis. BMC
Psychiatry 2014 Jun 20;14:183
Rosen, Larry D. iDisorder: Understanding our
obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. Macmillan, 2012.
Rugai, Joseph, and Joy-Telu Hamiliton-Ekeke.
"A Review of Digital Addiction: A Call for Safety Education." Journal
of Education and e-Learning Research 3.1 (2016): 17-22.
Schou Andreassen C,
Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, et al. The
relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms
of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict
Behav 2016 Mar;30(2):252-262.
Shapira
NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck PE, Jr, Khosla UM, McElroy SL. Psychiatric features of
individuals with problematic internet use. J Affect Disord. 2000;57(1-3):267–72.
Sheridan, Elizabeth. "All the World’sa
Smartphone: Changing the Stage of Human Interaction." (2018).
Smith, 2015 A. Smith US smartphone Use in 2015 Pew Research
Center (2015).
Sousa DF, Filho JDQ,
Bezerra Cavalcanti RCP, Santos ABD, Rolim Neto ML. The impact of the ‘blue
whale’ game in the rates of suicide: Short psychological analysis of the
phenomenon. Int J Soc
Psychiatry. 2017;63:796–7.
Sunwoo, K. and K. Rando, 2002. A study of
internet addiction: Status, causes and remedies. Digital Addicts.
Tang J, Yu Y, Du Y, Ma Y, Zhang D, Wang J.
Prevalence of internet addiction and its association with stressful life events
and psychological symptoms among adolescent internet users. Addict Behav.
2014;39(3):744-747.
Tangmunkongvorakul
A, Musumari PM, Thongpibul K, Srithanaviboonchai K, Techasrivichien T,
Suguimoto SP, et al. Association of excessive smartphone use with psychological
well-being among university students in Chiang Mai, Thailand. PloS one.
2019;14(1):e0210294. Epub 2019/01/08. pmid:30615675; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMC6322718.
Tao S,
Wu X, Zhang S, Tong S, Hao J, Tao F. Association of alcohol use with
problematic mobile phone use and depressive symptoms among college students in
Anhui, China. Journal of Public Health. 2017;25(1):103–12.
Temel F, Önürmen O, Köprü M. Digital means
and the internet during electoral campaigns: A case study on university
students. Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition 2014; 5(9).
The power of 1.8 billion: Adolescents,
youth, and the transformation of the future. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2014. United Nations
Population Fund.
The Statistics Portal. 2018. Accessed
September 21, 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/467163/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-india/
Thomée et al.,
2011S. Thomée, A. Härenstam, M. Hagberg Mobile phone use and stress, sleep
disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults-a prospective
cohort study BMC public health, 11 (1) (2011), p. 66
Twenge, Jean M., Gabrielle N. Martin, and
Brian H. Spitzberg. "Trends in US Adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The
rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print."
Psychology of Popular Media Culture 8.4 (2019): 329.
Urgent notice on Education
and guiding work for preventing Primary and Middle School students from
indulging in Internet. The Ministry of Education of People's Republic of China.
URL: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/201804/t20180424_334106.html?from=groupmessage&isappinstalled=0 [accessed
2018-04-20]\
Van den Bulck J. Television viewing, computer
game playing, and Internet use and self-reported time to bed and time out of
bed in secondary-school children. Sleep-New York Then Westchester.
2004;27(1):101-104.
Varma, Harshika. "Digital Detox: The Art
of Switching Off." INROADS-An International Journal of Jaipur National
University 7.1and2 (2018): 8-12.
Vladan, Starcevic. 2013. “Is
Internet Addiction a Useful Concept?” Australian
& New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 47 (1): 16–19.
doi: 10.1177/0004867412461693
Walsh, S. P., K. M. White,
and R. M. Young. 2010. “Needing to Connect: The Impact of Self
and Others on Young People's Involvement with Their Mobile Phone.” Australian Journal of Psychology 62
(4): 194–203. doi: 10.1080/00049530903567229.
Wartberg L, Kriston L,
Zieglmeier M, Lincoln T, Kammerl R. A longitudinal study on psychosocial causes
and consequences of Internet gaming disorder in adolescence. Psychol Med 2019
Jan;49(2):287-294.
Willsher K. France to ban
mobile phones in schools from September. The Guardian. 2017 Dec 11. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/11/france-to-ban-mobile-phones-in-schools-from-september [accessed
2017-10-16] Research Report on Market Prospects and Investment Opportunities in
China's Online Game Industry, 2019-2024.
Wu AM,
Cheung VI, Ku L, Hung EP (2013) Psychological risk factors of addiction to
social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users. Journal of Behavioral
Addictions 2(3): 160–166.
Yalçın IA, Erdoğan S. Validity and
reliability of the Turkish version of the Digital Game Addiction Scale.
Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2015; 16(Special issue.1):10-18.
Yang SC, Tung CJ. Comparison of Internet
addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Comput Human Behav.
2007;23(1):79-96.
Yıldız Durak, Hatice. "What would you do
without your smartphone? Adolescents’ social media usage, locus of control, and
loneliness as a predictor of nomophobia." (2018).
Young KS, Yue XD, Ying L. Prevalence
estimates and etiologic models of Internet addiction. Internet addiction: A
handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment 2011; 3-17.
Young
KS. New York: Wiley; 1998. Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of
Internet Addiction and a Winning Strategy for Recovery.
Young, K. S., & de Abreu, C. N. (2011). Internet Addiction: A Handbook and Guide to
Evaluation and Treatment. John Wiley & Sons.
Young, K.: Internet addiction: Evaluation and
treatment. Student Brit. Med.1999, 7, 351-352.
Young, K., M. Pistner, J. O’Mara,
and J. Buchanan. 1999. “Cyber Disorders: The Mental Health
Concern for the New Millennium.” CyberPsychology
and Behaviour 2: 475–479. doi:10.1089/cpb.1999.2.475.
Yuvaraj, Mayank, and Amarjit Kumar Singh.
"Effects and measures of technostress among librarians in selected
university libraries of Delhi." Library Philosophy and Practice (2015):
0_1.
Zhang, Jie, Xinxia Liu, and Le Fang.
"Combined effects of depression and anxiety on suicide: A case-control
psychological autopsy study in rural China." Psychiatry research 271
(2019): 370-373.
Comments
Post a Comment