An Investigation on the Role of Defense Industry in the Economy of Pakistan
An Investigation on the Role of Defence Industry in the Economy of Pakistan
Fatima
Zaheer (Government & Public Policy)
National
Defense University Islamabad (NDU)
laureatefolks@gmail.com
1.
INTRODUCTION
There are three types of relationships between military spending
and economic growth: positive,
negative, and neutral, implying that it either helps or hinders the economy. To have a complex, confusing, and dynamic strategy for its
environment, Pakistan must increase its military spending. Growing security
concerns in Pakistan, such as inter-state border issues linked to the merger,
racial tensions, and radicalization within the country, impact the
battle against radicalism. Pakistan's defence industry has been dominated by India's
policy and investment since independence. On the other hand, India has accused
China of starting a conventional and nuclear arms race in the region
This document is based on secondary
data, with facts and graphics gathered from various sources, including
financial institutions, Gallup, and academic papers.
1.1 Problem Statement
The importance of Pakistan's
military sector in the economy is discussed in this article. By employing three
different schools of thought: positive, negative, and neutral. Threat
perceptions and security concerns have sparked a subcontinent-wide weapons race.
Growing security problems in Pakistan, such as inter-state border difficulties
linked to the merger, racial tensions, and radicalization within the country,
have an overall influence on the battle against radicalism. Pakistan has experienced
a slew of issues since independence, including economic and strategic survival, due to external threats and internal instability exacerbated by the
government's weak and haphazard policies and heavily plugged
international intrusions.
1.2 Research Questions
1. What role
does the defence sector have in Pakistan's economy?
2. Is the defence
industry beneficial to Pakistan's economy?
3. Is
Pakistan's defence sector stifling the country's economy?
4. Has the defence
sector had no impact on Pakistan's economy?
1.3 Hypothesis Development
The role of the defence sector in
Pakistan's economy is the research premise. Is there a link between these two
variables, or have you identified none?
1.4 Significance of the Research
This study discusses the impact of
the defence sector on Pakistan's economy. It has emphasized three schools of
thought on the influence of military spending on the economy, which has been
the subject of a general debate. Due to its geostrategic location, Pakistan
faces economic hurdles. The battle on radicalization has an impact because of
the country's expanding security concerns, including inter-state border
challenges connected to the merger, racial friction, and radicalization within
the country. There have been facts presented that add to the concerns.
2.
LITERATURE
REVIEW
Economic growth is defined as a gain
in total output and wealth and the ability to produce more of it. Gross
Domestic Product (GDP), which is the market value of all final goods and
services produced in a country over a period of time, and Gross National
Product (GNP), which is the market value of the final product and service (both
consumer and capital), plus income earned by the state, residents in foreign
countries minus local income but accumulated to foreigners, are the most
reliable indicators of economic growth. Both may be improved in various
ways, including via industry, productivity, agricultural efficiency, service
sector enhancement, revenue collection, and the collection of import customs
taxes. People may mix up the phrase’s economic growth and economic development,
despite being distinct. The former relates to "economic health," whilst the latter refers to "society and
its people's health."
Some researchers believe there is no
link between defence spending and the economy. In contrast, others believe that if the
defence industry is harmed, all other sectors, including economics,
development, and monetary benefits, will be at risk. Defence investment and the
defence sector are considered sources of increased demand and employment,
particularly in developing countries. The global defence sector generates
trillions of dollars annually. Military investment may have a favourable effect
on developing the industrial sector in the world's least developed
countries. By selling armaments and other related equipment, the defence
business brings in billions of money for countries.
Furthermore, these sectors' Research
and Development (R&D) sections to aid the civil, industrial sector in technical development and the country's skilled workforce development.
If nuclear reactors are effectively managed in Pakistan, they will help to
enhance the economy by providing energy.
The defence industry, on the other
hand, has a negative economic impact. Increased military spending, for example,
reduces civilian domestic output. The public defence sector
lags behind the private sector in terms of productivity, and the defence industry and military spending
"squeeze out" civilian spending.
While Fredericksen and Looney
distinguish between resource-rich and resource-constrained countries, they
state that while defence industry spending may be beneficial for industrially advanced states, it is more likely to divert funds away from more
creative domestic investments, resulting in a negative impact on growth for
states with developing industries
Other negative effects include the
crowding out of investment from the civilian sector, the military's
"absorption of scientists, engineers, designers, and other skilled
workers, thus divesting the vibrant civilian export-oriented industries," and
capital in the form of land is also diverted away from the civilian world.
The indirect impacts of defence sector
expenditure are still significant since research shows that military spending
drains the civilian economy. Still, it is also the sole institution in Pakistan
that employs the most people. It also helps the civilian sector by upgrading
infrastructures such as roads, communication lines, bridges, airports, and the social sector, including hospitals, schools, colleges, and
universities. Military-run institutions appeared to be more capable due to the large amount of money allocated
Because of the military's
development operations, the most distant portions of the nation, including tribal regions, northern regions, and parts of Balochistan, generally gain the
most. Along with military training, members of the armed services receive other
required training (such as medical, technical, and so on). The military also
rewards them for seeking higher education, which benefits them and their children
In Pakistan, 63 percent of the
population lives in villages. When retired army troops return to their
villages, they generally start schools, local technical training workshops,
medical pharmacies, or other enterprises to help the rural people grow
socially
Defence businesses globally earn
billions of dollars each year. There are plans for Pakistan's military sector
to be indigenized as part of the country's independence
Pakistan has had challenges in terms
of strategic, economic, and natural resource issues since independence. There
were sixteen active ordnance Factories on Indian land at Independence, but none on Pakistani territory. Pakistan's defence spending has
risen steadily in recent years. Even though Pakistan's shaky economy
could not support it, its military spending has come at the expense
of development
Since the 1947 partition of South
Asia, the two nuclear-armed neighbours have been at odds. The military has
fought four wars, three of which took place in Kashmir
Pakistan lacks the requisite
equipment to begin building its own weapons factory. In January 1948, it was
refused a part in the regulatory factories. Instead, it received an inadequate
payment of six crore rupees, which was insufficient to cover even the
construction of a plant. To meet the challenge, Pakistan has to develop its own
military sector or import the required defence equipment from outside. During the 1950s, Pakistan negotiated defence agreements
with the United States to ensure the delivery of cutting-edge weaponry to its
troops, which lasted until the 1965 Indo-Pak War. Defense Production Division was
formed in 1972 to formulate policies, articulate goals, coordinate procurement
and developmental operations, and accelerate technical development
to achieve greater self-reliance through indigenization
In 2009, Pakistan's defence sector completed
equipment worth $6.3 billion, and by 2015, it was anticipated to reach $10.4
billion. The majority of the items were made for the military's domestic
requirements. In defence work, Pakistan has followed a strategy of
self-assurance. Since 2002, a scheme has been in place to lower the current
capacity of defence industrial facilities to promote arms export. As a result, the country's weaponry exports more than tripled in 2012,
reaching about $300 million. 73, up from $100 in 2006 and $40 million in 2000,
a 650 percent gain
Previous researchers believed there
was no link between defence expenditure and the economy. Still, some believe that
if the defence industry is damaged, all other sectors, including economics,
development, and monetary gains, would be vulnerable. Defence investment and
the defence sector boost demand and create more
employment, particularly in developing nations. The global military sector
generates trillions of dollars each year. Military investment may have a
beneficial influence on developing the industrial sector in the world's
least developed countries. The defence business generates billions of dollars
in revenue for governments by selling guns and other associated equipment.
Defence spending is regarded as
undesired expenditures and a burden on an economy since it diverts resources from economic programmes
On
the other hand, in Pakistan, the defence sector offers health, education, transportation, communication, and other social sector-related services that contribute to economic
growth. The governments have arguments to spend more on defence based on the aforementioned reasons. One study found that increasing defence spending
through inflation boosts economic development, especially in
resource-constrained nations like Pakistan
Economic growth is defined as a rise
in overall output and wealth and the ability to generate more of it.
Pakistan spends about 3% of its GDP on defence, which means that 97% of that
money might be better spent by reducing waste, improving skills, and increasing
accountability at all levels. The 3% might also be used to promote economic growth,
particularly through conversions.
3.
LIMITATIONS
Only secondary data is used in this
study. The information was gathered from several different financial
institutions. Because of privacy concerns, getting military personnel's
opinions and data is challenging. If possible, future research might focus on
primary data to better understand the relationship between the economy and the defence
industry.
4.
CONCLUSION
Military spending that already
exists must be put to the best possible use. Excesses such as needless imports
of luxury cars or other luxury things for top commanders should be reduced, as
should the effectiveness of military procurements. Resources can be saved by
limiting high-ranking officers' monetary rewards and eliminating communication
waste in inter-and intra-services setups due to underdeveloped C4Is. General
Musharraf's administration took several noteworthy initiatives to solve this
issue. In 2002, Shireen Mazari observed: With the presence of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff Committee, there should be comprehensive cooperation between the three
services in terms of doctrine and induction of new weapons systems, but the
reality is different, even at the level of R&D, where each service appears
to be "doing it alone." 95 Not only did it waste time and space, but
it also wasted resources. Inter-service rivalries that lead to final excesses
and turf battles should be eradicated, and operations should be characterized
by 'genuine jointness.’ Private firms should be brought in, particularly in
non-strategic avenues, to improve capacity and efficiency, develop a target-oriented
strategy, and free up resources for key avenues.
Economic growth is defined as a gain
in overall production and wealth and the ability to create more total
output. Pakistan spends over 3% of its GDP on defence, which means that 97 percent
of that money might be better spent by reducing waste, improving skills, and
increasing accountability at all levels. The 3% might also be used to promote
the economy, particularly through conversions. War may be
more expensive than protecting the state's defence capacity, therefore for a
country like Pakistan, which has already invested heavily in its military,
maintaining a sophisticated military is costly. Innovation that gives security
and safety to the state while also offering possibilities for economic recovery
can provide the basis for sensible industrial strategy by investing in defence
infrastructure and spending.
5. REFERENCES
Ahmed, W.
A. (2019). Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and
CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Air Qual Atmos Heal 12, pp. 945–953.
Ahmed, Z.
M. (2020). Analyzing the linkage between military spending, economic growth,
and ecological footprint in Pakistan: evidence from cointegration and
bootstrap causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res , pp. 41551–41567.
Amir-ud-Din,
W. S. (2019). Revisiting arms race between India and Pakistan: a case of the asymmetric causal relationship of military expenditures. Def Peace Econ, p.
21.
Asad
Abbasi, M. R. (2017). MILITARY SPENDING, INEQUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH:
EVIDENCE FROM PAKISTAN. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, vol 55 issue 02,
19.
Chawla, S.
(2008). Pakistan's military spending: Socio‐economic
dimensions. Strategic Analysis Vol 25, Issue 05, 703-716.
Dipankar
Baner, R. B. ( 2000). Post-Cold War Security Studies in Pakistan: Continuity
and Change’, in Security Studies in South Asia: Change and Challenges.
Manohar (p. 11). Manohar Publishers.
Dogan, U.,. (2020). The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental
Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS by considering cross-section dependence
and heterogeneity. . Sci Total Environ 723:138063.
Duchin, W.
L. (1983). Military Spending: Facts and figures, Worldwide Implications and
Future Outlook. Oxford University Press, New York. Retrieved from Duchin,
Wassily Leontief and Faye. 1983. "Military Spending: Facts and figures,
Worldwide Implications and Future Outlook ." Oxford University Press New
York
Faruqui,
A. (2002). In the 1990s, the economy slowed down to a crawl, as successive
civilian regimes outdid each other in corruption and mismanagement. IPRI
Journal 2, no. 1, 22.
Khan, D.
(2021 ). Political Economy of Uneven State Spatiality: Conflict, Class, and
Institutions in the Postcolonial State of Pakistan. A Journal of Economics,
Culture & Society Volume 33, Issue 1, 52-70.
Looney, F.
(2015). Defence Expenditures and Economic Growth. Retrieved from Margalla
paper:
https://ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/margalla-paper/margalla-papers-2015/08-Military-Spending.pdf.
Mirza, M.
N. (2015). MILITARY SPENDING AND ECONOMICS. Retrieved from margalla-paper:
https://ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/margalla-paper/margalla-papers-2015/08-Military-Spending.pdf.
Muhammad Azfar Anwar, Z. R. (2012). DEFENSE SPENDING-ECONOMIC GROWTH
NEXUS: A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN. Pakistan Economic and Social Review Volume
50, No. 2, 163-182.
Muhammad
Nadeem Mirza, D. Z. (2015). MILITARY SPENDING AND ECONOMICS. Retrieved from
margalla-paper. 8: https://ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/margalla-paper/margalla-papers-2015/08-Military-Spending.pdf
Nasir M. Khilji, A. M. (1997). Military Expenditures and Economic
Growth in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, p. 16.
Sen, S. D.
(1983). Military Expenditure, Spin-off and economic Development. Journal of
Development Economics 13, no. 1. .
Siddiqui,
T. (2019, 3 21). Poor Nation, Rich Army. Foreign policy, p. 6.
Smith, S.
D. (1983). Military Expenditure and Growth in Less Developed Countries.
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27.
World
Bank. (2013). Pakistan: Rural Population (% of Total Population). IBRD-IDA,
p. 11.
Zaidi, S.
(2014). Rethinking Pakistan’s Political Economy: Class, State, Power, and
Transition. Economic & Political Weekly 49 (5), pp. 47–54.
Comments
Post a Comment